Author dsdale24
Recipients Darren.Dale, benjamin.peterson, daniel.urban, dsdale24, ncoghlan, ned.deily
Date 2011-05-14.18:27:53
SpamBayes Score 3.01147e-07
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <BANLkTinQdKy8Z1pyfdJZWVPms_Lb=aMxzQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to <BANLkTikTOrcXw8dog1rwHGm98T2YaL31Jg@mail.gmail.com>
Content
On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 12:20 PM, Benjamin Peterson
<report@bugs.python.org> wrote:
>
> Benjamin Peterson <benjamin@python.org> added the comment:
>
> 2011/5/14 Darren Dale <report@bugs.python.org>:
>>
>> Darren Dale <dsdale24@gmail.com> added the comment:
>>
>> Is there anything preventing this patch from being merged?
>
> I have to make time to think about the API a bit more.

Ok. Maybe you will come up with another alternative that hadn't
occurred to me. But I have given this issue quite a bit of thought,
considered several alternatives, and felt fortunate to find a solution
that preserves backwards compatibility, supports the property
decorator syntax, and meshes well with the existing syntax for
abstract methods. Perhaps, if you shared your concerns, I could help
address them and maybe save you some time.

Darrren
History
Date User Action Args
2011-05-14 18:27:54dsdale24setrecipients: + dsdale24, ncoghlan, benjamin.peterson, ned.deily, daniel.urban, Darren.Dale
2011-05-14 18:27:53dsdale24linkissue11610 messages
2011-05-14 18:27:53dsdale24create