This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author sdaoden
Recipients nadeem.vawda, neologix, pitrou, ronaldoussoren, santoso.wijaya, sdaoden, vstinner
Date 2011-05-10.11:59:52
SpamBayes Score 4.991263e-07
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <20110510115934.GA23147@sherwood.local>
In-reply-to <1304976994.14.0.502934856435.issue11877@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
Content
I don't agree with you and i don't believe it is implemented like
that.  But it seems i am the only one on this issue who sees it
like that.  Thus i apply 11877.6.diff.

> Declaring variables as "auto" is not necessary in C code and not
> used anywhere else in Python's source code

Changed.

> Steffen, you changed the default to doing a "full sync" in your
> last patch

Changed all through.

> The reason being that Apple and NetBSD folks should know what
> they're doing [.]
> People requiring write durability will probably manage to find
> this full_sync parameter.

This sounds logical.  I've changed the doc in os.rst so that it
includes a note on *which* operating systems actually do something
dependend on that argument.
I should have done that from the very beginning.

> Finally, depending on the workload, it could have a significant
> performance impact.

:-)
Files
File name Uploaded
11877.6.diff sdaoden, 2011-05-10.11:59:51
History
Date User Action Args
2011-05-10 11:59:58sdaodensetrecipients: + sdaoden, ronaldoussoren, pitrou, vstinner, nadeem.vawda, neologix, santoso.wijaya
2011-05-10 11:59:52sdaodenlinkissue11877 messages
2011-05-10 11:59:52sdaodencreate