Author pitrou
Recipients Netto, Rhamphoryncus, Trundle, amaury.forgeotdarc, flub, forest, georg.brandl, ggenellina, gregory.p.smith, jamescooper, kbk, larsimmisch, pitrou, python-dev, terry.reedy, vstinner
Date 2011-05-04.18:06:56
SpamBayes Score 9.885e-07
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <1304532418.78.0.0553737491064.issue1856@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
Should be fixed in 3.2 and 3.3 now. I don't really want to bother with 2.7 and 3.1 (the GIL implementation is different), but someone can backport the patch if they want to :)
History
Date User Action Args
2011-05-04 18:06:58pitrousetrecipients: + pitrou, georg.brandl, terry.reedy, gregory.p.smith, kbk, amaury.forgeotdarc, ggenellina, Rhamphoryncus, larsimmisch, vstinner, forest, flub, jamescooper, Trundle, Netto, python-dev
2011-05-04 18:06:58pitrousetmessageid: <1304532418.78.0.0553737491064.issue1856@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2011-05-04 18:06:56pitroulinkissue1856 messages
2011-05-04 18:06:56pitroucreate