This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author neologix
Recipients nadeem.vawda, neologix, ronaldoussoren, sdaoden, vstinner
Date 2011-04-19.17:39:21
SpamBayes Score 6.691125e-07
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <1303234762.52.0.706759541504.issue11877@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
I know that POSIX makes no guarantee regarding durable writes, but IMHO that's definitely wrong, in the sense that when one calls fsync, he expects the data to be committed to disk and be durable.
Fixing this deficiency through Python's exposed fsync might thus be a good idea (for example, the Window version probably doesn't call fsync, so it's already not a direct mapping).
History
Date User Action Args
2011-04-19 17:39:22neologixsetrecipients: + neologix, ronaldoussoren, vstinner, nadeem.vawda, sdaoden
2011-04-19 17:39:22neologixsetmessageid: <1303234762.52.0.706759541504.issue11877@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2011-04-19 17:39:21neologixlinkissue11877 messages
2011-04-19 17:39:21neologixcreate