Author nadeem.vawda
Recipients Christophe Simonis, Garen, amaury.forgeotdarc, arekm, asvetlov, doko, eric.araujo, georg.brandl, jcea, jreese, lars.gustaebel, leonov, loewis, nadeem.vawda, nicdumz, nikratio, ockham-razor, pitrou, proyvind, rcoyner, shirish, strombrg, thedjatclubrock, vstinner, ysj.ray
Date 2011-04-08.00:20:00
SpamBayes Score 0.0004798
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <>
> As a reference, I think you are refering to #5863 and #10791. Pretty fine job, I must say.

Thank you :)

> Nadeem, what do you think?. Is xz in your list?.

Yes, it's the next substantial thing I was planning on working on. I don't have
a lot of free time at the moment, though, so it might take a while. But I'll
definitely have it done in time for the release of 3.3 ;)

Looking at the pyliblzma code, I see that it provides the same thread-safety
guarantees as bz2 does. In rewriting, I would like to remove the locking code,
as it complicates the control flow logic of the C code, and doesn't seem like
the sort of thing a compression library should be concerned with. Are there any
objections to this? (Also, if anyone knows why bz2 was written to be thread-safe
in the first place, please enlighten me)
Date User Action Args
2011-04-08 00:20:04nadeem.vawdasetrecipients: + nadeem.vawda, loewis, georg.brandl, doko, jcea, amaury.forgeotdarc, arekm, lars.gustaebel, pitrou, vstinner, nicdumz, eric.araujo, Christophe Simonis, rcoyner, proyvind, asvetlov, nikratio, leonov, Garen, ysj.ray, thedjatclubrock, ockham-razor, jreese, strombrg, shirish
2011-04-08 00:20:04nadeem.vawdasetmessageid: <>
2011-04-08 00:20:02nadeem.vawdalinkissue6715 messages
2011-04-08 00:20:00nadeem.vawdacreate