This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author ncoghlan
Recipients Trundle, benjamin.peterson, daniel.urban, docs@python, eric.araujo, ncoghlan, pitrou, rhettinger
Date 2011-04-07.04:50:18
SpamBayes Score 1.7196074e-07
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <1302151819.09.0.724675886969.issue10977@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
I thought about a warning, but the problem is that a subclass using the concrete API as part of its *implementation* of the associated slot or method is actually perfectly correct usage.

I'm not sure this is enough to give up on the idea of OrderedDict being a dict subclass implemented in C, though. It seems to me that some defensive internal checks (to pick up state corruption due to this problem) would be a lesser evil than giving up on being a dict subclass.
History
Date User Action Args
2011-04-07 04:50:19ncoghlansetrecipients: + ncoghlan, rhettinger, pitrou, benjamin.peterson, eric.araujo, Trundle, daniel.urban, docs@python
2011-04-07 04:50:19ncoghlansetmessageid: <1302151819.09.0.724675886969.issue10977@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2011-04-07 04:50:18ncoghlanlinkissue10977 messages
2011-04-07 04:50:18ncoghlancreate