Message132010
> > Senthil's patch allows a redirect to ftp while Guido's doesn't.
>
> That is a good question. Should we? It doesn't look like ftp:
> participates in the vulnerability, but I'm not sure how useful it is
> either.
I would say accept it anyway. That way we minimize potential for
compatibility breakage.
(do we support "ftps" as well? I don't think so)
> > Senthil's patch doesn't seem to fix urllib-inherited code, only
> urllib2- (see FancyURLopener.redirect_internal()).
>
> Right, that's for Python 3.
FancyURLopener is still present in Python 3 (even though we would like
to deprecate it in 3.3). |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2011-03-24 17:08:38 | pitrou | set | recipients:
+ pitrou, gvanrossum, barry, georg.brandl, orsenthil, vstinner, benjamin.peterson, r.david.murray |
2011-03-24 17:08:38 | pitrou | link | issue11662 messages |
2011-03-24 17:08:37 | pitrou | create | |
|