Message131699
> I would still favour committing the semaphore-based version first
> (especially in 3.2), and then discussing performance improvements if
> desired.
For 3.2, I would prefer a solution that makes least changes to the
current code. This is better than fundamentally replacing the
synchronization mechanism which locks are based on.
For 3.3, I predict that any Semaphore-based version will be shortly
replaced by something "fast". Benchmarks seem to indicate that you can
get much faster than semaphores. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2011-03-21 22:52:53 | loewis | set | recipients:
+ loewis, pitrou, kristjan.jonsson, tim.golden, brian.curtin, sbt |
2011-03-21 22:52:50 | loewis | link | issue11618 messages |
2011-03-21 22:52:50 | loewis | create | |
|