Message13031
Logged In: YES
user_id=8861
Sorry, I don't agree entirely with either of the responses.
1) I should have said no commonly used *on-screen* entity
has this behavior. Backward compatibility can be handled
easily by creating new subclasses of Image that have the
proposed behavior. (I think I also disagree with the
behavior for Variables, since unsetting a variable can also
cause the screen appearance to change, but I haven't thought
about it carefully enough to have a strong opinion.)
2) This is true only if the last reference to the image is
the one being held by CPython. If a circular structure
refers to an image, the last reference will be deleted by
the garbage collector, not by CPython, so the image will not
disappear until garbage collection occurs.
I understand the reasoning, and it's not worth it to me to
go through the PEP process; I just don't agree.
|
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2007-08-23 14:07:45 | admin | link | issue632323 messages |
2007-08-23 14:07:45 | admin | create | |
|