Author neologix
Recipients neologix, sable
Date 2011-03-07.20:53:53
SpamBayes Score 1.20069e-05
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <AANLkTi=E675UOiUCyc6pc=heYfPx7=dfkCSGA65xaJiN@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to <1299492932.61.0.0861363966012.issue11185@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
Content
> wait4 without WNOHANG works fine. waitpid works fine even with WNOHANG.
> I don't know which workaround is the better.

As far as the test is concerned, it's of course better to use wait4
without WNOHANG in a test names test_wait4 (especially since waitpid
is tested elsewhere)...
History
Date User Action Args
2011-03-07 20:53:54neologixsetrecipients: + neologix, sable
2011-03-07 20:53:53neologixlinkissue11185 messages
2011-03-07 20:53:53neologixcreate