Message130196
> The cygwin changes are no-ops, just refactoring the needlessly nested
> if statement for clarity. I can revert them.
Perhaps you can commit them separately? I don't think they need review.
As for the getargs.c change, perhaps Martin has an opinion. I bet he's more knowledgeable than me on the matter. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2011-03-06 22:03:39 | pitrou | set | recipients:
+ pitrou, loewis, twouters |
2011-03-06 22:03:39 | pitrou | set | messageid: <1299449019.68.0.765419610231.issue11410@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2011-03-06 22:03:39 | pitrou | link | issue11410 messages |
2011-03-06 22:03:39 | pitrou | create | |
|