Message129966
> Just to be clear, I'm not at all criticizing the current GIL
> implementation, there's been a great work done on it.
> I'm just saying that releasing and re-acquiring the GIL around fast
> syscalls is probaly not a good idea.
If these syscalls aren't likely to yield control to another thread, then
I agree there's no point in releasing the GIL around them.
(but is it the case that they are always fast? for example, how about
dup() on a network file system? or is it indifferent?) |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2011-03-03 13:09:12 | pitrou | set | recipients:
+ pitrou, amaury.forgeotdarc, eric.smith, neologix |
2011-03-03 13:09:11 | pitrou | link | issue11382 messages |
2011-03-03 13:09:11 | pitrou | create | |
|