Author georg.brandl
Recipients docs@python, eli.bendersky, georg.brandl, giampaolo.rodola, ncoghlan, terry.reedy
Date 2011-02-25.09:36:52
SpamBayes Score 8.15949e-05
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <1298626613.72.0.825083812537.issue11015@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
(2) would be my choice.  (1) *should* be true, but this is a change in the test semantics.  (3) would be feature creep and I don't think it's a good idea.
History
Date User Action Args
2011-02-25 09:36:53georg.brandlsetrecipients: + georg.brandl, terry.reedy, ncoghlan, giampaolo.rodola, eli.bendersky, docs@python
2011-02-25 09:36:53georg.brandlsetmessageid: <1298626613.72.0.825083812537.issue11015@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2011-02-25 09:36:52georg.brandllinkissue11015 messages
2011-02-25 09:36:52georg.brandlcreate