This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author alexis
Recipients alexis, eric.araujo, kelsey.hightower, tarek
Date 2011-02-16.10:36:44
SpamBayes Score 1.5310724e-07
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <1297852604.81.0.527444395964.issue11219@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
Hi, 

I was more thinking about something like: if the license is specified in the "License" metadata, then check that it's not a well known license (which can and must be provided by the classifiers instead).

At the end, the code you've wrote is useful, but not complete.

Additionally, it seems that your patch make check complaining if you just have *defined* classifiers and license (even if the license is not provided in the classifiers: it complains if there is both defined, regardless what is defined). It should check instead if the classifier field contain the same thing than the license field.
History
Date User Action Args
2011-02-16 10:36:44alexissetrecipients: + alexis, tarek, eric.araujo, kelsey.hightower
2011-02-16 10:36:44alexissetmessageid: <1297852604.81.0.527444395964.issue11219@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2011-02-16 10:36:44alexislinkissue11219 messages
2011-02-16 10:36:44alexiscreate