Message126198
> > That's my opinion too. So, instead, of doing the above surgery inside
> > the IO stack, the SocketIO layer could detect the timeout and disallow
> > further access. What do you think?
>
> So after a timeout occurs the file-object basically becomes worthless?
> Would it make sense to automatically call the close method of the
> file-object after this occurs?
Actually, we only need to forbid further reads (writes would always
work). I think we should still let the user call the close method
themselves. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2011-01-13 20:35:10 | pitrou | set | recipients:
+ pitrou, loewis, beazley, gregory.p.smith, amaury.forgeotdarc, roysmith, ned.deily, dabeaz, rosslagerwall |
2011-01-13 20:34:58 | pitrou | link | issue7322 messages |
2011-01-13 20:34:58 | pitrou | create | |
|