Author v+python
Recipients amaury.forgeotdarc, brian.curtin, gvanrossum, pitrou, v+python
Date 2011-01-06.09:43:49
SpamBayes Score 7.97873e-05
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <1294307045.25.0.679082146508.issue10841@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
stderr is notable by its absence in the list of O_BINARY adjustments.

So -u does do 2/3 of what my windows_binary() does :)  Should I switch my test case to use stderr to demonstrate that it doesn't help with that?  I vaguely remember that early versions of DOS didn't do stderr, but I thought by the time Windows came along, let's see, was that about 1983?, that stderr was codified for DOS/Windows.  For sure it has never been missing in WinNT 4.0 +.
History
Date User Action Args
2011-01-06 09:44:05v+pythonsetrecipients: + v+python, gvanrossum, amaury.forgeotdarc, pitrou, brian.curtin
2011-01-06 09:44:05v+pythonsetmessageid: <1294307045.25.0.679082146508.issue10841@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2011-01-06 09:43:49v+pythonlinkissue10841 messages
2011-01-06 09:43:49v+pythoncreate