➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author loewis
Recipients kermode, loewis, mark.dickinson, ncoghlan, pitrou, rupole, teoliphant
Date 2011-01-05.19:40:41
SpamBayes Score 0.0039243386
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <4D24C938.50100@v.loewis.de>
In-reply-to <1294152882.35.0.707448361917.issue10181@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
Content 
> Martin, we would like to exclude Py_buffer from the stable ABI for
> Python 3.2, until we have a chance to thrash out the missing pieces
> of the documentation for 3.3. I *think* it is a documentation
> problem, but until we're certain, it seems safer to leave it out.

Fine with me. Attached is a patch; it would be good if someone could
confirm that this exactly comprises the API that should be hidden.
Files
File name Uploaded
pybuffer.diff loewis, 2011-01-05.19:40:41
History
Date User Action Args
2011-01-05 19:40:44loewissetrecipients: + loewis, teoliphant, mark.dickinson, ncoghlan, rupole, kermode, pitrou
2011-01-05 19:40:41loewislinkissue10181 messages
2011-01-05 19:40:41loewiscreate