Author loewis
Recipients kermode, loewis, mark.dickinson, ncoghlan, pitrou, rupole, teoliphant
Date 2011-01-05.19:40:41
SpamBayes Score 0.00392434
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <>
In-reply-to <>
> Martin, we would like to exclude Py_buffer from the stable ABI for
> Python 3.2, until we have a chance to thrash out the missing pieces
> of the documentation for 3.3. I *think* it is a documentation
> problem, but until we're certain, it seems safer to leave it out.

Fine with me. Attached is a patch; it would be good if someone could
confirm that this exactly comprises the API that should be hidden.
File name Uploaded
pybuffer.diff loewis, 2011-01-05.19:40:41
Date User Action Args
2011-01-05 19:40:44loewissetrecipients: + loewis, teoliphant, mark.dickinson, ncoghlan, rupole, kermode, pitrou
2011-01-05 19:40:41loewislinkissue10181 messages
2011-01-05 19:40:41loewiscreate