Author loewis
Recipients Rhamphoryncus, amaury.forgeotdarc, belopolsky, doerwalter, eric.smith, ezio.melotti, georg.brandl, lemburg, loewis, pitrou, rhettinger, stutzbach, vstinner
Date 2010-12-30.01:02:43
SpamBayes Score 1.32585e-07
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <>
In-reply-to <>
>> Seriously, it can wait 3.3.
> What exactly can wait until 3.3?  The presented patch introduces no
> user visible changes.  It is only a stepping stone to restoring some
> sanity in a way supplementary characters are treated by narrow builds.
>  At the moment, it is a mine field: you can easily produce surrogate
> pairs from string literals and codecs, but when you start using them,
> you have 50% chance that things will blow up, 40% chance of getting
> wrong result and maybe 10% chance that it will work.

I think the proposal is that fixing this minefield can wait until
Python 3.3 (or even 3.4, or later).

I plan to propose a complete redesign of the representation of Unicode
strings, which may well make this entire set of changes obsolete.

As for language definition: I think the definition is quite clear
and unambiguous. It may be that Python 3.2 doesn't fully implement it.

IOW: relax.
Date User Action Args
2010-12-30 01:02:46loewissetrecipients: + loewis, lemburg, doerwalter, georg.brandl, rhettinger, amaury.forgeotdarc, belopolsky, Rhamphoryncus, pitrou, vstinner, eric.smith, stutzbach, ezio.melotti
2010-12-30 01:02:43loewislinkissue10542 messages
2010-12-30 01:02:43loewiscreate