➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author loewis
Recipients eric.araujo, exarkun, giampaolo.rodola, gregory.p.smith, jhylton, loewis, orsenthil, pitrou, stutzbach
Date 2010-12-17.00:15:31
SpamBayes Score 0.00619188
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <1292544934.25.0.524938889943.issue10721@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content 
The question really is whether we want or want not to support RFC 1945 (i.e HTTP/1.0). If we want to support it, we also must comply to section 3.1, which says

 The version of an HTTP message is indicated by an HTTP-Version field
 in the first line of the message. If the protocol version is not
 specified, the recipient must assume that the message is in the
 simple HTTP/0.9 format.

If we then choose to not support HTTP/0.9 (after recognizing that the message is HTTP/0.9), we must then reject the request. According to RFC 2145, we then may send back error 505 (HTTP version not supported).
History
Date User Action Args
2010-12-17 00:15:34loewissetrecipients: + loewis, jhylton, gregory.p.smith, exarkun, orsenthil, pitrou, giampaolo.rodola, stutzbach, eric.araujo
2010-12-17 00:15:34loewissetmessageid: <1292544934.25.0.524938889943.issue10721@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2010-12-17 00:15:32loewislinkissue10721 messages
2010-12-17 00:15:31loewiscreate