This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author pitrou
Recipients exarkun, gregory.p.smith, jhylton, orsenthil, pitrou, stutzbach
Date 2010-12-15.19:00:04
SpamBayes Score 1.6855953e-06
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <>
> But http.client needs to be able to communicate with any random server
> created since the dawn of time.

Well, that sounds a bit unreasonable...

> Often on 8 bit microcontrollers that haven't been updated since 1994.

Anyone with such needs should write specialized software, shouldn't they?

> How does keeping 0.9 client support in hurt us?

In any such situation, there's typically a long-term cost in additional maintenance when patching and improving the code.
More specifically, this issue came when discussing #6791. Protecting http.client against unbounded reads will be hairy if we have to support HTTP 0.9-style "simple responses".
Date User Action Args
2010-12-15 19:00:06pitrousetrecipients: + pitrou, jhylton, gregory.p.smith, exarkun, orsenthil, stutzbach
2010-12-15 19:00:06pitrousetmessageid: <>
2010-12-15 19:00:04pitroulinkissue10711 messages
2010-12-15 19:00:04pitroucreate