Author pitrou
Recipients benjamin.peterson, pitrou, thomasvs
Date 2010-12-04.19:58:54
SpamBayes Score 6.52512e-07
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <1291492732.3534.12.camel@localhost.localdomain>
In-reply-to <1291492527.99.0.0512230477023.issue6101@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
Content
> Well, I just checked, and from 2.3 to 2.6 opcodes were only added,
> existing ones were never renumbered.
> 
> 2.7 however reshuffled a bunch of them, for no apparent reason at all:

LIST_APPEND was renumbered because it gained an argument.
There are also new opcodes in this list.
Regardless, there is no guarantee about opcode numbering stability. You
cannot infer such an expectation from previous behaviour.
History
Date User Action Args
2010-12-04 19:58:56pitrousetrecipients: + pitrou, thomasvs, benjamin.peterson
2010-12-04 19:58:54pitroulinkissue6101 messages
2010-12-04 19:58:54pitroucreate