Message122838
Yes, a cheeseshop package is definitely part of the plan, I didn't mean to imply otherwise. It won't be hard to automate the packaging, and indeed I'll wind up doing that anyway even if the tests stay inside Lib/email.
I will say that that I'm probably only +0.5 on this change...I like it from a consistency standpoint (heading toward all stdlib tests being in Lib/test) and it seems like it would make the job of packagers who desire a 'no tests' option easier. But things have been working fine as they are, which is why I'm not at a full +1 :). |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2010-11-29 18:24:38 | r.david.murray | set | recipients:
+ r.david.murray, barry, brett.cannon, theller, rhettinger, ghaering, belopolsky, tarek, gpolo, ezio.melotti, eric.araujo, michael.foord |
2010-11-29 18:24:38 | r.david.murray | set | messageid: <1291055078.6.0.0754228114617.issue10572@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2010-11-29 18:24:37 | r.david.murray | link | issue10572 messages |
2010-11-29 18:24:37 | r.david.murray | create | |
|