Author skrah
Recipients belopolsky, eric.smith, ezio.melotti, lemburg, mark.dickinson, skrah, vstinner
Date 2010-11-28.17:48:45
SpamBayes Score 3.32099e-07
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <1290966528.93.0.911600804469.issue10557@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
> PyUnicode_EncodeDecimal() is either unnecessary or should be exposed
> as a codec.

I'm depending on PyUnicode_EncodeDecimal in cdecimal. In fact, it saved
me quite a bit of trouble. I wouldn't be surprised if other extension
writers use it as well.
History
Date User Action Args
2010-11-28 17:48:49skrahsetrecipients: + skrah, lemburg, mark.dickinson, belopolsky, vstinner, eric.smith, ezio.melotti
2010-11-28 17:48:48skrahsetmessageid: <1290966528.93.0.911600804469.issue10557@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2010-11-28 17:48:45skrahlinkissue10557 messages
2010-11-28 17:48:45skrahcreate