This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author pitrou
Recipients Justin.Cappos, bbangert, exarkun, giampaolo.rodola, loewis, ned.deily, nicdumz, pitrou, ronaldoussoren, roysmith
Date 2010-11-22.15:06:46
SpamBayes Score 1.30922e-05
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <1290438403.3566.0.camel@localhost.localdomain>
In-reply-to <>
> > Well, unless someone explains convincingly how the current behaviour is
> > desireable (rather than misleading and useless), I really think this is
> > a bug that should be fix (then we can also discuss what the fix should
> > exactly be).
> So please propose a fix.

Well, in case you didn't notice, a fix was already proposed :)
(not in proper form, granted, and lacking a test)

At least now you won't argue that this is normal behaviour, so we are
Date User Action Args
2010-11-22 15:06:50pitrousetrecipients: + pitrou, loewis, ronaldoussoren, exarkun, roysmith, giampaolo.rodola, ned.deily, nicdumz, bbangert, Justin.Cappos
2010-11-22 15:06:46pitroulinkissue7995 messages
2010-11-22 15:06:46pitroucreate