This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author eric.araujo
Recipients ajaksu2, eric.araujo, ncoghlan, orsenthil
Date 2010-11-03.20:24:22
SpamBayes Score 3.910124e-08
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <1288815864.26.0.3281844062.issue1500504@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
Sure, adding tests is a no-brainer.

Regarding the module, I’m a bit reluctant.  I see value in providing low-level building blocks (think OS calls) and high-level utilities for regular use, but here it seems that urllib.parse and urischemes are at the same level.  I’m not opposed to the functionality itself—I would like to use a class simply named “URI” (and generally get better names, that is RFC names instead of specific inventions), have components normalization and such goodies—but I think the existing module can get fixes and improvements.  I fear the confusion that could be caused by having two modules for the same task, unless you want to propose that the new module deprecate urllib.parse.

Senthil, what is your opinion?
History
Date User Action Args
2010-11-03 20:24:24eric.araujosetrecipients: + eric.araujo, ncoghlan, orsenthil, ajaksu2
2010-11-03 20:24:24eric.araujosetmessageid: <1288815864.26.0.3281844062.issue1500504@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2010-11-03 20:24:23eric.araujolinkissue1500504 messages
2010-11-03 20:24:22eric.araujocreate