Author r.david.murray
Recipients brett.cannon, ezio.melotti, michael.foord, pitrou, r.david.murray, rhettinger
Date 2010-11-03.13:01:22
SpamBayes Score 9.61694e-06
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <1288789285.15.0.420993930529.issue10273@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
assertEquals existed forever, too, but we deprecated that :) (with no intent to remove it, as I understand it).

There is no more ambiguity in "assertLessThan" than there is in assertLT, one just has more letters.  True, you have to look it up the first time, but you have to do that anyway, so I don't see that as a big deal.  Once you've looked it up the first time you know the naming rule and you can figure out all the other names.  (Which is not true now, since instead of 'LessThan' we have "Less", which does *not* correspond to to the special method name by a simple rule).
History
Date User Action Args
2010-11-03 13:01:25r.david.murraysetrecipients: + r.david.murray, brett.cannon, rhettinger, pitrou, ezio.melotti, michael.foord
2010-11-03 13:01:25r.david.murraysetmessageid: <1288789285.15.0.420993930529.issue10273@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2010-11-03 13:01:23r.david.murraylinkissue10273 messages
2010-11-03 13:01:23r.david.murraycreate