Message120188
Just my 2 cents:
- I think dedocumenting the type-specific methods is fine (it doesn't mean removing them, though); or perhaps relegate them to some advanced section
- It's unfortunate that the renaming suggestion comes so late; I'm not sure it's a good idea to rename lots of things after they were introduced (although I really don't like assertRegexpMatches)
- assertIsInstance looks more natural to me than the alternative
- I don't think there's any point in undoing the package splitting, since it makes Michael's work easier and other people didn't object (not people who actively contribute to unittest, that is) |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2010-11-01 23:34:02 | pitrou | set | recipients:
+ pitrou, rhettinger, ezio.melotti, michael.foord |
2010-11-01 23:34:02 | pitrou | set | messageid: <1288654442.42.0.114502418368.issue10273@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2010-11-01 23:34:00 | pitrou | link | issue10273 messages |
2010-11-01 23:34:00 | pitrou | create | |
|