Author asdfasdfasdfasdfasdfasdfasdf
Recipients Ryan.Tucker, ahasenack, asdfasdfasdfasdfasdfasdfasdf, debatem1, devin, giampaolo.rodola, heikki, janssen, jsamuel, kiilerix, orsenthil, pitrou, vila, zooko
Date 2010-11-01.03:45:42
SpamBayes Score 0.00235683
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <1288583145.3.0.287732339061.issue1589@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
So I know the current patch doesn't support IP addresses but I thought I would link to what mozilla considered a security problem(just for future reference):

CVE-2010-3170: http://www.mozilla.org/security/announce/2010/mfsa2010-70.html

"Security researcher Richard Moore reported that when an SSL certificate was created with a common name containing a wildcard followed by a partial IP address a valid SSL connection could be established with a server whose IP address matched the wildcard range by browsing directly to the IP address. It is extremely unlikely that such a certificate would be issued by a Certificate Authority."
History
Date User Action Args
2010-11-01 03:45:45asdfasdfasdfasdfasdfasdfasdfsetrecipients: + asdfasdfasdfasdfasdfasdfasdf, zooko, janssen, orsenthil, pitrou, giampaolo.rodola, vila, heikki, ahasenack, kiilerix, debatem1, jsamuel, devin, Ryan.Tucker
2010-11-01 03:45:45asdfasdfasdfasdfasdfasdfasdfsetmessageid: <1288583145.3.0.287732339061.issue1589@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2010-11-01 03:45:43asdfasdfasdfasdfasdfasdfasdflinkissue1589 messages
2010-11-01 03:45:43asdfasdfasdfasdfasdfasdfasdfcreate