➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author pitrou
Recipients belopolsky, casevh, georg.brandl, jimjjewett, ked-tao, loewis, mark.dickinson, pitrou, rhettinger, skip.montanaro, tim.peters
Date 2010-10-17.17:50:42
SpamBayes Score 0.00018027928
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <1287337837.3447.36.camel@localhost.localdomain>
In-reply-to <4CBB3500.90108@v.loewis.de>
Content 
Le dimanche 17 octobre 2010 à 17:40 +0000, Martin v. Löwis a écrit :
> Martin v. Löwis <martin@v.loewis.de> added the comment:
> 
> > The issue Raymond raised is the potential impossibility of making the
> > change /after/ we settle on a stable ABI. The question is whether the
> > ABI will be enforced starting from 3.2, or from a later date.
> 
> I'd like to repeat that it will not be impossible to fix this after the
> ABI is in place.

At the cost of very annoying complications, though.
History
Date User Action Args
2010-10-17 17:50:46pitrousetrecipients: + pitrou, tim.peters, loewis, skip.montanaro, georg.brandl, rhettinger, jimjjewett, mark.dickinson, belopolsky, casevh, ked-tao
2010-10-17 17:50:44pitroulinkissue9778 messages
2010-10-17 17:50:42pitroucreate