This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author loewis
Recipients belopolsky, casevh, georg.brandl, jimjjewett, ked-tao, loewis, mark.dickinson, pitrou, rhettinger, skip.montanaro, tim.peters
Date 2010-10-17.17:40:17
SpamBayes Score 0.0027729736
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <>
In-reply-to <1287169943.3422.7.camel@localhost.localdomain>
> The issue Raymond raised is the potential impossibility of making the
> change /after/ we settle on a stable ABI. The question is whether the
> ABI will be enforced starting from 3.2, or from a later date.

I'd like to repeat that it will not be impossible to fix this after the
ABI is in place.
Date User Action Args
2010-10-17 17:40:21loewissetrecipients: + loewis, tim.peters, skip.montanaro, georg.brandl, rhettinger, jimjjewett, mark.dickinson, belopolsky, pitrou, casevh, ked-tao
2010-10-17 17:40:18loewislinkissue9778 messages
2010-10-17 17:40:17loewiscreate