Message118823
> Given the range of people advocating for this change, this looks to me
> like it should be a release blocker for 3.2. Raymond's comment about
> performance seems especially important, and since the world seems to
> be moving toward 64-bit operating systems (certainly should happen in
> a big way during the lifetime of Python 3) it seems worthwhile to hold
> up further 3.2 releases until this is solved.
I think this is a bit exagerated. The performance issues will only
appear if you have huge dicts and sets.
The issue Raymond raised is the potential impossibility of making the
change /after/ we settle on a stable ABI. The question is whether the
ABI will be enforced starting from 3.2, or from a later date. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2010-10-15 19:12:28 | pitrou | set | recipients:
+ pitrou, tim.peters, loewis, skip.montanaro, georg.brandl, rhettinger, jimjjewett, mark.dickinson, belopolsky, casevh, ked-tao |
2010-10-15 19:12:26 | pitrou | link | issue9778 messages |
2010-10-15 19:12:26 | pitrou | create | |
|