On Fri, Oct 08, 2010 at 06:25:26PM +0000, Alexander Belopolsky wrote:
> In this case, I wonder if "equivalent to" code should be added to the
> section for enumerate() and map().  Also since any() and all() have
> "equivalent to" code, I think min(), max() and sum() deserve it as
> well.

I think, you are asking for consistency in docs, right?

As a sidenote those explanations should be okay, but merging it with
the explanation of the functions may add to confusion (like the zip
example did in this case). 

Even I am +1 on removing that complex equivalent code in the zip
documentation, as it can confusing to the newcomer. But I am also okay
with moving that 'equivalent to code' further down in the
explanation.