This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author hunteke
Recipients amaury.forgeotdarc, georg.brandl, hunteke, pitrou
Date 2010-09-26.04:43:27
SpamBayes Score 3.575072e-05
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <1285476213.97.0.331675138201.issue9942@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
> Why do you read it into a cStringIO? A cStringIO has the same interface
> as a file, so you could simply operate on the file directly.

In that particular case, because it isn't actually a file.  That workflow was my attempt at simplification to illustrate a point.

I think the point is moot however, as I've gotten what I needed from this feature request/discussion.  Not one, but three Python developers seem opposed to the idea, or at least skeptical.  That's enough to tell me that my first-order supposition that Python objects could be MERGEABLE is not on target.

Cheers.
History
Date User Action Args
2010-09-26 04:43:35huntekesetrecipients: + hunteke, georg.brandl, amaury.forgeotdarc, pitrou
2010-09-26 04:43:33huntekesetmessageid: <1285476213.97.0.331675138201.issue9942@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2010-09-26 04:43:32huntekelinkissue9942 messages
2010-09-26 04:43:27huntekecreate