➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author pitrou
Recipients BreamoreBoy, ajaksu2, loewis, mdr0, nnorwitz, pitrou, sable, tim.peters, wheelrl
Date 2010-09-21.15:43:18
SpamBayes Score 0.0003213262
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <1285083799.46.0.0195220470789.issue678250@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content 
Interestingly, the matter was discussed on another issue, #2643. I also agree that ideally flush() should become a no-op (only in 3.2, since it would break compatibility). But then we should also expose a separate sync() method with the current behaviour.
History
Date User Action Args
2010-09-21 15:43:19pitrousetrecipients: + pitrou, tim.peters, loewis, nnorwitz, wheelrl, mdr0, sable, ajaksu2, BreamoreBoy
2010-09-21 15:43:19pitrousetmessageid: <1285083799.46.0.0195220470789.issue678250@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2010-09-21 15:43:18pitroulinkissue678250 messages
2010-09-21 15:43:18pitroucreate