Message116929
On Sep 18, 2010, at 12:23 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
>Antoine Pitrou <pitrou@free.fr> added the comment:
>
>Barry's request looks reasonable. Any build information will have
>platform specificities to it.
Thanks. I'll take that as approval to land it. :)
>On the other hand, this begs the question of why you want to access
>the Python makefile at all. Is there any information in there that
>isn't currently exposed? I think it would be nice if people could
>completely forget about the existence of that file, and instead have
>nice programmatic APIs to query properties they are interested in.
In principle I agree that the parsing of pyconfig.h and Makefile are
implementation details that shouldn't matter. I'm working on the bug to
pre-parse these at build time and generate a _sysconfig module that sysconfig
would import. However, for introspection purposes, since pyconfig.h's
location is exposed, I wanted symmetry for Makefile. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2010-09-20 12:10:06 | barry | set | recipients:
+ barry, pitrou, benjamin.peterson, eric.araujo |
2010-09-20 12:10:05 | barry | link | issue9877 messages |
2010-09-20 12:10:03 | barry | create | |
|