This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author barry
Recipients barry, benjamin.peterson, eric.araujo, pitrou
Date 2010-09-20.12:10:02
SpamBayes Score 6.518199e-10
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <20100920080953.55bfa8fe@mission>
In-reply-to <1284812616.15.0.681363404292.issue9877@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
Content
On Sep 18, 2010, at 12:23 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:

>Antoine Pitrou <pitrou@free.fr> added the comment:
>
>Barry's request looks reasonable. Any build information will have
>platform specificities to it.

Thanks.  I'll take that as approval to land it. :)

>On the other hand, this begs the question of why you want to access
>the Python makefile at all. Is there any information in there that
>isn't currently exposed? I think it would be nice if people could
>completely forget about the existence of that file, and instead have
>nice programmatic APIs to query properties they are interested in.

In principle I agree that the parsing of pyconfig.h and Makefile are
implementation details that shouldn't matter.  I'm working on the bug to
pre-parse these at build time and generate a _sysconfig module that sysconfig
would import.  However, for introspection purposes, since pyconfig.h's
location is exposed, I wanted symmetry for Makefile.
History
Date User Action Args
2010-09-20 12:10:06barrysetrecipients: + barry, pitrou, benjamin.peterson, eric.araujo
2010-09-20 12:10:05barrylinkissue9877 messages
2010-09-20 12:10:03barrycreate