Message116871
> pyOpenSSL is stable, in production use and
> has a decent API. The ssl module is good enough for HTTPS client
> use. pyOpenSSL provides a robust server side implementation with
> all the required certificate and context handling needed for this.
>
> We could tell people to use the ssl module for clients and
> pyOpenSSL for the server side and perhaps integrate the OpenSSL
> package into the ssl namespace.
In this case, this should be decided early, so that I know if I should
continue caring about the ssl module or not. I'm not interested in
maintaining potentially obsolete code. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2010-09-19 14:25:33 | pitrou | set | recipients:
+ pitrou, lemburg, loewis, georg.brandl, gregory.p.smith, exarkun, vstinner, giampaolo.rodola, lorph, heikki, eric.araujo, debatem1, dmalcolm, daniel.urban, mcrute, jsamuel |
2010-09-19 14:25:31 | pitrou | link | issue8998 messages |
2010-09-19 14:25:31 | pitrou | create | |
|