Message116809
Well, the core issue is a disagreement on the way to go.
I would agree with Benjamin's and Christian's proposal, given that it's quite practical to implement. Guido's proposal means we would have to add new modules just so that the relevant C types can be exposed "at the right place".
The types module is generally used for low-level trickery (since most useful types are accessible from the builtin namespace), and IMO it makes sense to have a dedicated module for that. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2010-09-18 16:18:10 | pitrou | set | recipients:
+ pitrou, gvanrossum, christian.heimes, benjamin.peterson, BreamoreBoy |
2010-09-18 16:18:10 | pitrou | set | messageid: <1284826690.07.0.196238113599.issue1605@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2010-09-18 16:18:09 | pitrou | link | issue1605 messages |
2010-09-18 16:18:08 | pitrou | create | |
|