Author loewis
Recipients baikie, loewis, pitrou, vstinner
Date 2010-09-04.18:48:45
SpamBayes Score 1.87448e-05
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <4C82948B.9060909@v.loewis.de>
In-reply-to <1283624365.52.0.618634514921.issue8372@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
Content
> I guess this test should simply removed.

(not sure which test you are referring to: the test case, or the
test for too long path names:) I think both tests need to stay.

Instead, I think that testMaxPathLen is incorrect: it doesn't
take into account the terminating NUL, which also must fit
into the 108 bytes (IIUC). baikie: why did the test pass for
you?
History
Date User Action Args
2010-09-04 18:48:46loewissetrecipients: + loewis, pitrou, vstinner, baikie
2010-09-04 18:48:45loewislinkissue8372 messages
2010-09-04 18:48:45loewiscreate