Author pitrou
Recipients brian.curtin, loewis, pitrou, tim.golden
Date 2010-08-15.18:44:17
SpamBayes Score 0.00266065
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <1281897853.3194.7.camel@localhost.localdomain>
In-reply-to <4C68345D.4030309@v.loewis.de>
Content
> > Most people use buffered I/O, and the buffered layer automatically retries.
> 
> I see. I think this is already slightly problematic: if you send an
> interrupt, it won't oblige. IMO, any such loop ought to be
> interruptable.

Well, the loop stops when an error status is returned by the raw IO
layer. At that point, the buffered IO layer re-raises the error after a
bit of internal cleanup.
History
Date User Action Args
2010-08-15 18:44:26pitrousetrecipients: + pitrou, loewis, tim.golden, brian.curtin
2010-08-15 18:44:17pitroulinkissue9611 messages
2010-08-15 18:44:17pitroucreate