This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author benjamin.peterson
Recipients BreamoreBoy, benjamin.peterson, skrah
Date 2010-08-08.18:14:10
SpamBayes Score 1.6015607e-08
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <AANLkTin1CryMTowRo1iKKLj9SiT9NxNzG=_j2rZQfkJz@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to <1281291158.64.0.0517957888598.issue3539@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
Content
2010/8/8 Mark Lawrence <report@bugs.python.org>:
>
> Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> added the comment:
>
> Stefan, I'm not interested in researching something that has been available for others to research for two years, I don't understand why they aren't interested and I don't care.  If noone can be bothered with an issue why leave it to rot, why not simply close it?  Why is this issue different to others that I have set to pending and then after a couple of weeks closed without having a single comment back?

It's not different from others. Bugs should stay open until they are
resolved in some way. Closing a bug for lack of input is only
acceptable when the information needed is to clarify the problem from
the OP.
History
Date User Action Args
2010-08-08 18:14:12benjamin.petersonsetrecipients: + benjamin.peterson, skrah, BreamoreBoy
2010-08-08 18:14:11benjamin.petersonlinkissue3539 messages
2010-08-08 18:14:10benjamin.petersoncreate