Message112618
Getting *rid* of the name ConfigParser would be annoying and cause *gratuitous* code breakage.
If we are going to keep the name but get rid of the "unsafe" version then we can only replace it with what is now SafeConfigParser - as it is almost entirely compatible with it. (Modulo the bug fixing "behavioural change".)
So the real choices are:
* leave ConfigParser as it is
* deprecate it but not remove it (so as not to needlessly break code)
* deprecate now and replace with SafeConfigParser later
Only the last of these is a positive step forwards... :-)
(Strongly -1 on introducing *yet another name* to refer to these classes by.) |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2010-08-03 15:11:09 | michael.foord | set | recipients:
+ michael.foord, fdrake, brett.cannon, georg.brandl, rhettinger, eric.araujo, r.david.murray, till, lukasz.langa |
2010-08-03 15:11:09 | michael.foord | set | messageid: <1280848269.7.0.0226647102449.issue6517@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2010-08-03 15:11:08 | michael.foord | link | issue6517 messages |
2010-08-03 15:11:07 | michael.foord | create | |
|