Message112401
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 12:06 AM, Terry J. Reedy <report@bugs.python.org> wrote:
>
> Terry J. Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> added the comment:
>
> There are, perhaps 3 main issues with new features;
>
> 1. What is the specific proposal?
>
> In particular, where should the new menu entry go and what should it say.
edit -> syntax highlight
> 2. Will it hurt anything?
no
> 3. Will it be useful.
yes
> As to these, I suggest you try your own experiment. Rename x.html to x.py and pull into the editor.
>
> Doing that with controlflow.html shows that this appears to be harmless. For this file, it is also useless:
In this case useless it is. But try imagining some more <pre></pre>
friendly html. Would it not be asome if you could craft a file that
opens with your browser to see what it does before you run it with
python?
> a. My WinXP32 3.1.2 IDLE edit window does not have a horizontal scroll bar. It does not need one for <80 char lines. It also does not do autowrap, as that would be fatal for code. However, this file has some lines with a few hundred chars and there is no easy way to read them.
I can live with arrow keys
>
> b. The html for Python code is not always what you see in a browser. Here is one line from your example: "<span class="k">print</span> <span class="n">x</span><span class="p">,</span> <span class="nb">len</span><span class="p">(</span><span class="n">x</span><span class="p">)</span>" (no wrapping in the original).
>
> I think Tal's case of .py-less Python files is a reason to add a menu entry, and let the user beware with anything else.
>
Not a warning message please. Just put it off by default on non py
files, like it currently does. Hilighting is harmless and does not
change the contents of the file. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2010-08-01 23:11:33 | gert | set | recipients:
+ gert, terry.reedy, ggenellina, taleinat, cvrebert |
2010-08-01 23:11:32 | gert | link | issue6858 messages |
2010-08-01 23:11:32 | gert | create | |
|