Message 111960 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	vstinner
Recipients	alexandre.vassalotti, belopolsky, collinwinter, pitrou, vstinner
Date	2010-07-29.16:31:56
SpamBayes Score	0.007242989
Marked as misclassified	No
Message-id	<1280421119.86.0.68026891295.issue9410@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to

Content
I'm working on #3873 to add a read buffer (fixed size, 4096 bytes) to the unpickler. It's 6 to 8 times faster with the read buffer: but this patch is mainly to avoid the overhead introduced by the new I/O library (in Python2, unpickler was faster because it doesn't need to call Python functions to read some bytes). Is this feature included in this big patch?

I'm working on #3873 to add a read buffer (fixed size, 4096 bytes) to the unpickler. It's 6 to 8 times faster with the read buffer: but this patch is mainly to avoid the overhead introduced by the new I/O library (in Python2, unpickler was faster because it doesn't need to call Python functions to read some bytes). Is this feature included in this big patch?

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2010-07-29 16:31:59	vstinner	set	recipients: + vstinner, collinwinter, belopolsky, pitrou, alexandre.vassalotti
2010-07-29 16:31:59	vstinner	set	messageid: <1280421119.86.0.68026891295.issue9410@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2010-07-29 16:31:56	vstinner	link	issue9410 messages
2010-07-29 16:31:56	vstinner	create