Author ncoghlan
Recipients Julian.Scheid, barry, benjamin.peterson, georg.brandl, lregebro, maubp, ncoghlan, r.david.murray
Date 2010-07-28.22:25:25
SpamBayes Score 4.4767e-06
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <AANLkTin7eRKDeDP4QTDp7_7BJcp9dejJb=GtArBqiXXo@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to <1280324443.1.0.494519649979.issue7490@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
Content
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 11:40 PM, Peter <report@bugs.python.org> wrote:
>
> Peter <p.j.a.cock@googlemail.com> added the comment:
>
> I take it the IGNORE_EXCEPTION_DETAIL should ignore the module name
> fix will not be applied to Python 3.1.x?

Correct (it's a new feature rather than a bug fix)

> Is there a separate bug to enhance 2to3 to turn IGNORE_EXCEPTION_DETAIL
> on?

That would be a separate request, but I'm not sure it is even feasible
(doctests live inside strings, so I believe 2to3 has trouble fixing
them - otherwise we would just get it to handle the exception renaming
directly). Feel free to post an RFE though - the 2to3 folks can take a
look at it.
History
Date User Action Args
2010-07-28 22:25:27ncoghlansetrecipients: + ncoghlan, barry, georg.brandl, benjamin.peterson, lregebro, r.david.murray, Julian.Scheid, maubp
2010-07-28 22:25:25ncoghlanlinkissue7490 messages
2010-07-28 22:25:25ncoghlancreate