This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author richard
Recipients BreamoreBoy, doughellmann, giampaolo.rodola, richard
Date 2010-07-08.22:12:57
SpamBayes Score 0.03441959
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <>

I think I can see where you're coming from: assuming that someone else must have also had to resort to the name-mangling hack to extend the class? In that case yes, my patch would break their code. I'll look at re-working it to use properties while retaining the underlying attributes. Would that be acceptable?

What additional tests would you deem necessary?
Date User Action Args
2010-07-08 22:13:04richardsetrecipients: + richard, giampaolo.rodola, doughellmann, BreamoreBoy
2010-07-08 22:13:03richardsetmessageid: <>
2010-07-08 22:12:57richardlinkissue4184 messages
2010-07-08 22:12:57richardcreate