Message10779
Logged In: YES
user_id=6656
I'm not *trying* to be a party-pooper, but there's another
problem: the point of passing a mutable array is so that
fcntl.ioctl can return ioctl(2)'s return code rather than
the string it returns now. So if someone does use arrays
(or I guess Numeric.arrays?) for ioctls this would very
likely cause breakage. I don't know how likely that is.
Probably not very. But I know that if this change broke my
code, I'd be a bit miffed.
All this is a bit annoying, as mutating arrays is clearly
the right solution -- where's that time machine? |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2007-08-23 14:01:21 | admin | link | issue555817 messages |
2007-08-23 14:01:21 | admin | create | |
|