Author belopolsky
Recipients ajaksu2, akira, belopolsky, brett.cannon, daniel.urban, doerwalter, eric.araujo, ggenellina, kawai, l0nwlf, mark.dickinson, pitrou, r.david.murray, rafe, techtonik, tim.peters
Date 2010-06-12.05:07:58
SpamBayes Score 0.0122225
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <1276319281.99.0.591539527794.issue5094@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
There is a separate issue #5288 asking to support sub-minute offsets.  This is not hard, but the C code still has a few interfaces left from the time when offset was an integer # of minutes.  I am +1 to fix that, but not as a part of this issue.

On str(tz), I definitely want an invariant str(tz) == tz.tzname(None).  I am open to changes to tzname(), but we are very close to bikesheding here.  Let's settle for 'UTC±HH:MM'.  This seems to be the most common spelling for numeric timezones in various tables on the web.
History
Date User Action Args
2010-06-12 05:08:03belopolskysetrecipients: + belopolsky, tim.peters, doerwalter, brett.cannon, mark.dickinson, ggenellina, pitrou, techtonik, ajaksu2, kawai, eric.araujo, r.david.murray, rafe, daniel.urban, l0nwlf, akira
2010-06-12 05:08:01belopolskysetmessageid: <1276319281.99.0.591539527794.issue5094@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2010-06-12 05:08:00belopolskylinkissue5094 messages
2010-06-12 05:07:59belopolskycreate