Author pitrou
Recipients gregory.p.smith, hughsw, pitrou
Date 2010-06-02.15:56:41
SpamBayes Score 0.0122825
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <1275494197.3180.0.camel@localhost.localdomain>
In-reply-to <1275492749.57.0.0370658207184.issue8873@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
Content
> I think the default of 0, meaning unbuffered, is a poor choice.

So do I, but I'm not sure whether it's acceptable to change behaviour in
a potentially incompatible way.

> Barring that semantic change, please add a note to the doc:  "Most
> users will want to set bufsize=4096 for pipe-like buffering, or
> bufsize=1 for line-based buffering."  

Yes, it deserves a documentation note indeed.
History
Date User Action Args
2010-06-02 15:56:42pitrousetrecipients: + pitrou, gregory.p.smith, hughsw
2010-06-02 15:56:41pitroulinkissue8873 messages
2010-06-02 15:56:41pitroucreate