Message10555
Logged In: YES
user_id=261020
I don't see why it shouldn't substitue a GET. That certainly seems to be
the standard practice (well, at least that's what lynx does), and in the case
of the only site where I've encountered redirects on POST, the redirect URL
contains urlencoded stuff, so it clearly expects the user-agent to do a GET.
The site would break if this didn't happen, so I guess Netscape and IE must
do the same thing.
Clearly the RFC *does* allow this, though it doesn't require it (or specify
what should happen here in any way other than to say that a POST is not
allowed, in fact). Since it's standard practice and allowed by the RFC, I
don't think it should be an error.
John
|
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2007-08-23 14:00:59 | admin | link | issue549151 messages |
2007-08-23 14:00:59 | admin | create | |
|