Message105415
Ah, I’m glad I had one interesting comment out of three in my first
message :)
This change, although nice, seems a bit trivial for warranting taking so
much place in the what’s new. Or perhaps it’s a good thing; I don’t know
if people are aware of the goodness of the with statement far and wide.
I’m sure amk will edit the document if he thinks the example is out of
place. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2010-05-09 19:57:22 | eric.araujo | set | recipients:
+ eric.araujo, belopolsky, pitrou, giampaolo.rodola, tarek, ezio.melotti, stuaxo |
2010-05-09 19:57:20 | eric.araujo | link | issue4972 messages |
2010-05-09 19:57:18 | eric.araujo | create | |
|