Author eric.araujo
Recipients belopolsky, eric.araujo, ezio.melotti, giampaolo.rodola, pitrou, stuaxo, tarek
Date 2010-05-09.19:57:18
SpamBayes Score 0.00205862
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <>
In-reply-to <>
Ah, I’m glad I had one interesting comment out of three in my first
message :)

This change, although nice, seems a bit trivial for warranting taking so
much place in the what’s new. Or perhaps it’s a good thing; I don’t know
if people are aware of the goodness of the with statement far and wide.
I’m sure amk will edit the document if he thinks the example is out of
Date User Action Args
2010-05-09 19:57:22eric.araujosetrecipients: + eric.araujo, belopolsky, pitrou, giampaolo.rodola, tarek, ezio.melotti, stuaxo
2010-05-09 19:57:20eric.araujolinkissue4972 messages
2010-05-09 19:57:18eric.araujocreate